Tesla CEO Elon Musk should not be found in contempt of court because he has complied with the terms of a securities fraud settlement, his attorneys wrote in documents filed Monday night with the U.S. District Court in Manhattan.
Musk’s lawyers wrote that a Feb. 19 tweet merely restated prior disclosures on electric car production volumes. They wrote that the tweet after the markets closed did not reveal material information, nor did it alter the mix of data available to investors.
U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan ordered Musk to respond to a motion for contempt filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The agency alleges the Feb. 19 tweet was inaccurate and violated a requirement for tweets that could influence Tesla’s stock price to be approved by a company lawyer.
Musk’s 13-word Feb. 19 tweet said that Tesla would produce around 500,000 vehicles this year, but it wasn’t approved by the company’s disclosure counsel, the SEC said in court records.
The lawyer quickly realized it and summoned Musk to the company’s Fremont, California, factory to help write a correction four hours later. The company would make vehicles at a rate of 500,000 per year, but it wouldn’t produce a half-million in 2019.
The response by lead Musk attorney John C. Hueston of Newport Beach, California, also said that the settlement allows Musk “reasonable discretion” to determine if his communications would require the lawyer’s approval. In the case of the Feb. 19 tweet, Musk determined that it did not.
Musk, the document stated, has diligently complied with the court-approved settlement, dramatically reducing his activity on Twitter. Even though in his view there was no need to do it, Musk posted a clarification to the tweet after speaking with the Twitter baby-sitter, called the “disclosure counsel,” the paperwork said.
The SEC’s interpretation of the order also raises serious First Amendment issues “effectively requiring Musk to seek pre-approval of any tweet that relates to Tesla,” according to the documents.
It was unclear Monday night when Judge Nathan would rule on the SEC’s contempt motion, which was filed on Feb. 25.
The October settlement stemmed from tweets by Musk in August about having the money to take the company private at $420 per share. The funding was far from secured. The settlement specified governance changes, including Musk’s ouster as board chairman, as well approval of Musk’s tweets. Musk and Tesla each paid $20-million fines for the August tweets, which Musk made from his car on the way to the airport.
Legal experts say it’s unlikely that Musk will be punished severely, but the commission wants to get on the record that Musk violated the terms, to prepare for any future violations.
The tweet was posted and corrected after U.S. markets had closed, but experts say regulators don’t care much about that because stocks are traded nearly around the clock. Tesla’s stock rose by just $1.10, or less than 1 percent, the next day.